Après 15 années d’existence, le forum historique de Framasoft, ferme ses portes.
Pour les nostalgiques et les curieux, il reste toujours possible de consulter les discussions mais c’est maintenant le forum
Framacolibri qui prend la relève.
Si vous avez des questions, on se retrouve là-bas…
antistress a écrit:...il dort
:
encore quelques coups comme ça de la part du gourou d'Ubuntu, et ça va forker severe!
C'est gNewSense qui va être content
Something good is coming out of this though. There seems to be a ever greater awareness of the proprietary drivers included in Ubuntu, and a greater awareness of Ubuntu’s reliance of proprietary tools such as Launchpad, and new proprietary software coming from Canonical, like the mysterious Landscape. Some are saying that now is a good time to put more pressure on Canonical to release more of their code under a free software license. I doubt they will budge though. I hope that Canonical will learn that “freeware != free software”. Just because Ubuntu is free of charge doesn’t mean that it’s free software.
At least there’s projects like Gnewsense that are working on cleaning up Ubuntu. Hopefully they will release a meta-package at some point that I can just install that will remove all the proprietary software from a standard Ubuntu installation, which I can use on my desktop systems that doesn’t need wi-fi drivers, proprietary display drivers, etc.
Some are suggesting that they’ll switch to Debian Etch. I haven’t used Debian since just before Warty was released, so I’m not sure how it stacks up to Ubuntu, but it certainly seems worth the try.
MacGyver2 a écrit:Disgusting...absolutely disgusting hypocrisy. I have no problem with non-free software as long as there are still free choices out there...but I do have a massive problem with hypocrisy.
Ubuntu Bug #1 calls out Microsoft in particular and non-free software in general, accusing them of stiffling innovation. So what is Ubuntu going to do in order to fix that bug? Of course! Use non-free software! When they (MS, Apple, other Linux distros) do it, it is pure evil and they are hurting innovation!!! Grrr!!! But when Ubuntu does it, it's great! In fact, it's innovative! Yay!!! Makes sense to me!
And now all of the fanboys defend the shift because according to them, all that matters is market share. Sounds like this Ubuntu experiment failed and just turned into a simple case of jealousy. Waaah! Microsoft has more users than we do. We're not the popular kids!
Téthis a écrit:MacGyver2 a écrit:Disgusting...absolutely disgusting hypocrisy. I have no problem with non-free software as long as there are still free choices out there...but I do have a massive problem with hypocrisy.
Ubuntu Bug #1 calls out Microsoft in particular and non-free software in general, accusing them of stiffling innovation. So what is Ubuntu going to do in order to fix that bug? Of course! Use non-free software! When they (MS, Apple, other Linux distros) do it, it is pure evil and they are hurting innovation!!! Grrr!!! But when Ubuntu does it, it's great! In fact, it's innovative! Yay!!! Makes sense to me!
AntoineP a écrit:Téthis a écrit:MacGyver2 a écrit:Disgusting...absolutely disgusting hypocrisy. I have no problem with non-free software as long as there are still free choices out there...but I do have a massive problem with hypocrisy.[...]
Grrr!!! But when Ubuntu does it, it's great! In fact, it's innovative! Yay!!! Makes sense to me!
En fait, Shuttleworth est un peu le Montebourg de la communauté Linux.
De belles cravates.Athanor1 a écrit:Il a quoi de moins que les autres politiques ?
Le même que Shuttleworth avec la politique.Athanor1 a écrit:(et quel rapport avec le libre et le "moins libre" btw ?)
Utilisateur(s) parcourant actuellement ce forum : Aucun utilisateur inscrit
