re,
Merci à la Pologne, donc.
Voici la transcription de l'intervention Polonaise (sur le
wiki de la FFII) :
Chairman Mr Veerman:
The common position that we will adopt in a moment has been debated
laboriously and for a long time during the preparatory activities in
the Council. The text in front of us is carefully balanced and is a
compromise on which the Council reached, with a qualified majority,
an agreement in May.
After the formal adoption today, the text will be sent to the
European Parliament. I am convinced we are all ***spam*** to
the start of the discussions in the EP, hoping that potential
misunderstandings between the Council and the EP can be cleared, and
that the road to the definite adoption of this important draft
directive can be opened.
In document 16120/04 ADD1, you can find the declarations of the
Commission, and of the Hungarian, Latvian and Dutch delegations. The
Council will approve the incorporation of these declarations in the
minutes.
I see that Polands want to say something. Poland can speak.
Wlodzimierz Marcinski, Poland's undersecretary of state at the Ministry of Science and Information:
***spam***.
Mr Chairman, Mr Comisioner, High Council.
Poland with determination opt for unambiguous expression in the law of
European Union issues connected with the patentability of the computer
implemented inventions which the same time shall secure that computer
programs are excluded from patentability.
This position results from the fact, that the lack of order of such matters
which manifests both with difference in practice in particular European Union
countries as well as in acting of European Patent Office which has issued
many thousands of patents for computer programs are clearly noticeable.
In opinion of Poland this process should not be continued in such scale.
Poland having in mind the necessity of further research on directive project
to strength the legal reliability (...) the enterprises in area of reserch,
development do not withdraw its support for common position leading for
second hearing.
Poland however bring for withdrawal of the item concerning the project of
directive of European Parliament and the Council on Computer Implemented
Inventions from A list of the agenda of this Council meeting.
Polish Government needs still more time for preparing and deliver to the
Council appropriate statement in the matter which is an object of the
directive.
In our opinion such statement will be balanced, constructive in direction to
work out European compromise.
We think that some crucial items in the text of the project resulting from
the May 18th meeting of the Council are not in favour to function of small
and middle enterprises.
We back up the unambiguous legal instruments which shall guarantee that the
computer implemented inventions shall be pattentable but the computer
programs or its parts shall be certainly unpatentable.
***spam***
Chairman Mr Veerman:
Yes, I understand the Polish intervention in such a way that it
concerns a request to take this point off the list, because Poland
still desires a few more specifications regarding certain points. I
propose to honour this request.
Yes? Then point 16 has been removed from the A-items list. The
Commissioner:
Commissioner:
Yes, Mr President, may I say that the Commission regrets the
withdrawal of this item from the agenda, as the Commission attaches
great importance to its own proposal, as well as the agreement on
the common position that was reached during the Competitiveness
Council.
Chairman Mr Veerman:
I propose to take note of this remark of the Commission. And I stand
by my proposal to remove point 16 of the agenda. That is the case,
so then that is decided. Then move to point 15 ...
Puis un autre article de
ITRmanager.
Cordialement,
Totomatisme.
